CM ============================================================ CM dipole_cm_current.nec — TM-RFI-NEC-001 Rev A CM 40-Meter Dipole: Effect of Common-Mode Current on Pattern CM Frequency: 7.15 MHz CM CM Two models in one file (run separately by commenting/uncommenting EX cards): CM Model A: Ideal balanced dipole (no common-mode current) CM Model B: Dipole with 3m feed line acting as unintended radiator CM (common-mode current simulated by adding vertical wire at feed) CM CM Purpose: CM Demonstrate how common-mode current on feed line: CM 1. Distorts the azimuth pattern of the dipole CM 2. Introduces asymmetry and elevation angle changes CM 3. Creates spurious lobe toward nadir (ground noise pickup) CM CM Geometry (Model B — with feedline radiator): CM Dipole: horizontal, +/- 10.05m at height 10m CM Feed line stub: vertical wire from feed point down 3m (representing CM unshielded portion of coax braid with CM current) CM Feed point: center of dipole at (0, 0, 10m) CM ============================================================ CE CM ── DIPOLE ELEMENTS ────────────────────────────────────────── CM West half of dipole: tag 1 GW 1 20 -10.05 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.001 CM East half of dipole: tag 2 GW 2 20 0.0 0.0 10.0 10.05 0.0 10.0 0.001 CM ── FEEDLINE STUB (uncomment for Model B — with common-mode current) ── CM This simulates 3m of exposed coax braid with CM current flowing on it. CM Tag 3 — comment out for ideal balanced Model A: GW 3 15 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.001 CM ── GROUND ───────────────────────────────────────────────────── CM Sommerfeld-Norton real ground (average soil) GE 1 GN 2 0 0 0 13.0 0.005 CM ── FREQUENCY ────────────────────────────────────────────────── FR 0 1 0 0 7.15 0 CM ── EXCITATION ───────────────────────────────────────────────── CM MODEL A (balanced, no CM current): CM Excite at center of tag 1 (segment 20, the end closest to feed) — or use CM split feed: one EX card on each half with equal and opposite phases. CM Simple method: excite center segment of tag 1 (segment 20 = feed end) EX 0 1 20 0 1.0 0.0 CM MODEL B (with CM current on feed line stub): CM Comment out MODEL A excitation; use MODEL B excitation: CM Excite dipole center AND add partial CM current to stub CM (EX on stub tag 3 segment 1, with fraction of main feed): CM EX 0 1 20 0 1.0 0.0 CM EX 0 3 1 0 0.3 0.0 ← 30% of feed current = common-mode current on stub CM ── RADIATION PATTERNS ───────────────────────────────────────── CM Azimuth pattern at 10° elevation (horizontal component dominates): RP 0 1 73 1000 10.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 CM Elevation pattern broadside (azimuth = 90°): RP 0 46 1 1000 0.0 90.0 2.0 0.0 CM Elevation pattern endfire (azimuth = 0°): RP 0 46 1 1000 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 EN CM ============================================================ CM EXPECTED RESULTS: CM CM MODEL A (ideal, no CM current): CM Azimuth: figure-8, nulls at 0° and 180° (along wire axis) CM Maximum gain: ~8 dBi broadside (90°, 270°) CM Elevation angle of maximum: ~28° at 10m height on 40m CM Symmetry: perfect left-right, E/W symmetry CM CM MODEL B (with 3m CM current on stub): CM Azimuth: distorted figure-8, nulls filled in CM Asymmetry: N-S lobes become unequal (stub breaks symmetry) CM Additional low-angle lobe toward nadir: ground noise pickup increases CM Pattern tilt: maximum elevation angle shifts slightly CM Net effect: 3–10 dB increase in received noise from ground clutter CM CM COMPARING MODELS: CM Run both, compare azimuth plots. CM Difference = effect of common-mode current. CM Installing choke at feed point: returns to Model A pattern. CM CM RFI IMPLICATION: CM With CM current, the feed line ADDS to received noise from: CM - Ground currents (SMPS return currents in soil) CM - Nearby wiring in house (the braid is an antenna for house wiring noise) CM - Computer equipment (CM current couples from USB, Ethernet, PSU ground) CM Choke at antenna feed point breaks CM path → noise reduction of 10–30 dB CM ============================================================